[netperf-talk] To git or not to git
Hangbin Liu
haliu at redhat.com
Sun Feb 26 17:31:05 PST 2012
I have never used svn. But based on my experience on cvs and git, I'd
prefer to use git because of its easy version control and file
management. No comment for svn.
On Fri, 2012-02-24 at 13:23 -0800, Rick Jones wrote:
> To git, or not to git, that is the question.
> Whether tis nobler in the mind to suffer
> The slings and arrows of using subversions
> Or to take git against a sea of troubles
> And by opposing end them?
>
> Subversion has been working fine for me for netperf since the first day
> that netperf's SCN stopped being discrete tar files :) However, there
> have been some questions about migrating the netperf source repository
> to git and I thought I would put it to the folks on the lists.
>
> So, to git or not to git? Does everyone who is using subversion now to
> get bits have a way to use git?
>
> happy benchmarking,
>
> rick jones
> _______________________________________________
> netperf-talk mailing list
> netperf-talk at netperf.org
> http://www.netperf.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/netperf-talk
More information about the netperf-talk
mailing list