[netperf-talk] To git or not to git

Cook, Jonathan jonathan.cook at nist.gov
Fri Feb 24 14:37:16 PST 2012


Since I have never used git I would prefer sticking to subversion.

Jon Cook

-----Original Message-----
From: netperf-talk-bounces at netperf.org [mailto:netperf-talk-bounces at netperf.org] On Behalf Of Rick Jones
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2012 2:23 PM
To: netperf-talk at netperf.org; netperf-dev at netperf.org
Subject: [netperf-talk] To git or not to git

To git, or not to git, that is the question.
Whether tis nobler in the mind to suffer The slings and arrows of using subversions Or to take git against a sea of troubles And by opposing end them?

Subversion has been working fine for me for netperf since the first day that netperf's SCN stopped being discrete tar files :)  However, there have been some questions about migrating the netperf source repository to git and I thought I would put it to the folks on the lists.

So, to git or not to git?  Does everyone who is using subversion now to get bits have a way to use git?

happy benchmarking,

rick jones
_______________________________________________
netperf-talk mailing list
netperf-talk at netperf.org
http://www.netperf.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/netperf-talk


More information about the netperf-talk mailing list