[netperf-talk] global question concerning Netperf test and SMP support

[Simon Duboue]

>>I still can not explain the negative CPU utilzation in remote. What
>> considerations could we do with the confidence interval? Is it
>> acceptable? Could we ignore it?
>
>CPU utilization should never be negative.
>
>I suppose since the system of interest is the one on which netperf is 
>running (?) the remote CPU util could be ignored for the purposes of 
>confidence intervals - in that case I would just remove the -C from the 
>netperf command line.
>
>But CPU util going negative is a bug and makes me uncomfortable.

The system of interest is the one on which netserver is running.
The CPU utilization looks good, only the first results are negative in my 
previous message.

It becomes clearer.

Thank you.

Simon Duboué

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.netperf.org/pipermail/netperf-talk/attachments/20120424/d074574f/attachment.html>