[netperf-talk] Urgent UDP_Stream question
Rick Jones
rick.jones2 at hp.com
Thu Nov 10 09:53:19 PST 2011
On 11/10/2011 08:06 AM, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
>
>> UDP_STREAM test:
>> Socket Size, bytes Message Size, bytes Elapsed Time, secs Messages
>> Throughput, 10^6bits/sec
>> Okay Errors
>> 112640 65507 60.00 57408 0 501.42
>> 112640 60.00 94 0.82
>
> A big part of the problem here is that netperf has been asked
> (implicitly) to send 64KB datagrams. Assuming a standard 1500b
> MTU, these will get fragmented into around 40 separate IP
> fragments per datagram. If even just a single fragment is
> dropped, then the entire message is lost.
It would be worthwhile to check the statistics on the receiver - both
for UDP to see if there were socket buffer overflows, and for IP to
check for those fragment drops, which should manifest as IP fragment
reassembly failures (though thanks to the 16 bit IP fragment ID they can
manifest as UDP checksum failures - web search for "frankengram."
More information about the netperf-talk
mailing list