[netperf-talk] CPU Utilization Issues

Rick Jones rick.jones2 at hp.com
Fri Mar 5 11:01:04 PST 2010


Gerhard Hartung wrote:
> I have no idea therefore I was aksing it.

The sources and thus binaries will have "what" strings in them which should give 
some idea as to the age of the bits you have.

Folks under *nix should pull 2.4.5 bits or top of trunk.  Folks under Windows 
can take 2.4.5 bits plus the netserver.c from top of trunk, or top of trunk.

rick jones

> 
> Thanks
> 
> Gerhard
> 
> BTW: Why we woukd have then a ftp server with a different version and how to download from trunk?
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: netperf-talk-bounces at netperf.org [mailto:netperf-talk-bounces at netperf.org] On Behalf Of Lentz, Benjamin A.
> Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 9:43 AM
> To: netperf-talk at netperf.org
> Subject: Re: [netperf-talk] CPU Utilization Issues
> 
> 
>>>Latest update from him is that using netperf -c -C with no parameters
>>>results in a segmentation fault on both the vendor's system and our
>>>system.
>>
>>It has been a while - which version of netperf is this again?  It
> 
> "should" be
> 
>>either 2.4.5 or the top of trunk from
> 
> http://www.netperf.org/svn/netperf2/trunk
> 
>>(subversion client to pull the bits)
> 
> 
> 
> It looks like... netperf-2.4.0-rc2 ?
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netperf-talk mailing list
> netperf-talk at netperf.org
> http://www.netperf.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/netperf-talk
> _______________________________________________
> netperf-talk mailing list
> netperf-talk at netperf.org
> http://www.netperf.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/netperf-talk



More information about the netperf-talk mailing list