[netperf-talk] PAP_MAX_CACHE_LEVELS and psp_iticksperclktick in file netsys_hpux11i.c

[Alexander Vinokur]

Hi Rick,

struc pst_processor in HP-UX 11.23 doesn't contain psp_cpu_frequency.

So, we don't need to search some other #define instead of PSP_MAX_CACHE_LEVELS.

Regards,

Alex Vinokur




-----Original Message-----
From: netperf-talk-bounces at netperf.org [mailto:netperf-talk-bounces at netperf.org] On Behalf Of Rick Jones
Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 8:25 PM
To: Alexander Vinokur
Cc: Netperf-Talk
Subject: Re: [netperf-talk] PAP_MAX_CACHE_LEVELS and psp_iticksperclktick in file netsys_hpux11i.c

Alexander Vinokur wrote:
> Hi Rick,
> 
> [---omitted---]
> 
>>So, after your fix for PAP to PSP, anything 
>>compiled on 11.23 
> 
> 
> PSP_MAX_CACHE_LEVELS undefined on 11.23, it defined only starting in 11.31
> 
> 
>> or later will get the right thing by using the updated pstat info, and
>> anything compiled on HP-UX 11.11 will get the right thing > by running only
>> on a system where the iticks tick at the same frequency as > the CPU.

well, so much for that plan :(  I don't happen to have an 11.23 system handy to 
check, but is the pstat field used under the #ifdef PSP_MAX_CACHE_LEVELS present 
in 11.23?  If so, we might find some other #define to trigger off of, unless 
someone feels compelled to write an autoconf macro to check for it at ./configure 
time. (something I don't feel quite qualified to do but would be happy to accept 
as a patch).

rick jones
_______________________________________________
netperf-talk mailing list
netperf-talk at netperf.org
http://www.netperf.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/netperf-talk

This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,
you may review at http://www.amdocs.com/email_disclaimer.asp