[netperf-talk] can't use the netper2.4.5 on windows platform after compiling with windows DDK
Rick Jones
rick.jones2 at hp.com
Mon Jul 13 10:54:28 PDT 2009
Jia He wrote:
> Yes. I use the "-l 10" as the command durance time.
>
> Also, I tried to use the netperf without any options, there is still no
> any data summary output and it still shows "no response received".
Does some Windows-specific tool/command show there is a TCP endpoing listening
at port number 12865?
Is there any sort of firewall in place that might also be affecting loopback
traffic?
Does some Windows-specific tool/command show there is still a netserver daemon
running on the system?
rick jones
> Thanks
>
> He Jia
>
> 2009/7/14 Rick Jones <rick.jones2 at hp.com <mailto:rick.jones2 at hp.com>>
>
> Jia He wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
> I downloaded the netperf2.4.5 from the official website and
> compiling the source codes with Windows DDK. Here is my
> compiling platform.
>
> netperf2.4.5
> window 2003 enterprise version.
> windows ddk 3790.1830
>
> After I followed the instruction compiling the bits
> files(netperf & netserver) successfully, I was going to verify
> the bits files are fine or not.
>
> 1. start netserver.exe from command line
> 2. using the command "netperf -H 127.0.0.1 -l 10"
>
>
> Is that "-l 10" or is that "-1 10" in your command line. In my
> mailer it looks like you wrote "minus one ten" rather than "dash ell 10"
>
> How about if you just say "netperf" with no command-line arguments.
>
> 3. it will take long time with message "netperf:
> receive_response: no response received. errno 0 counter 0".
> There is no any data summary as output.
>
> is it wrong with my compiling causing this invalid case? does
> anyone know the root cause and how to resolve it.
>
> Jia He
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> netperf-talk mailing list
> netperf-talk at netperf.org <mailto:netperf-talk at netperf.org>
> http://www.netperf.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/netperf-talk
>
>
>
More information about the netperf-talk
mailing list