[netperf-talk] unkown response to debug check
Clive Barker
echelon360 at yahoo.com
Sun Apr 5 20:57:51 PDT 2009
thanks all for responding!
No there's no firewall in the setup.
I think it's got to do with the X25 statements, i'll need to figure out if the translate statements are configured correctly. I'm performing this throughput test to gauge the impact of total no of x25 call on a port. It's not entirely fun btw :)
--- On Sun, 4/5/09, Mark Wagner <mwagner at redhat.com> wrote:
From: Mark Wagner <mwagner at redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [netperf-talk] unkown response to debug check
To: echelon360 at yahoo.com
Cc: netperf-talk at netperf.org
Date: Sunday, April 5, 2009, 5:40 PM
Clive Barker wrote:
> hi all,
>
> i can't seem to get a packet going through via netperf
>
> i've set up the server to listen to port 4001 and a standard telnet
(using port 4001) verifies this to be working.However, when i run the netperf
command
>
> netperf -p 4003 -H 192.168.1.13
So this is a typo right, you are using -p 4001 on the netperf side right ?
Are there any firewalls in play here ?
-mark
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.netperf.org/pipermail/netperf-talk/attachments/20090405/f098b7ec/attachment.htm
More information about the netperf-talk
mailing list