[netperf-talk] concurrent sessions with Netperf 2.4.2
Rick Jones
rick.jones2 at hp.com
Fri Jun 1 10:16:53 PDT 2007
anil mishra wrote:
> Hi all,
> I was trying to do some benchmarking to run the concurrent sessions. It
> does not seem to run the seesions concurrently. Am I missing something?
Canyou tell us the specific set of command line options and shell stuff
you were using to get concurrent sessions?
> I tried to run TCP_RR using Netperf and got the result as around ~18000
> TPS for 1 byte request/response size which gives me latency as around
> ~50 usec.
>
> Then I tried to run the latency test using Iperf 2.0.2 for 1 byte data
> transfer and that gives me the number something like 124 KBytes/s which
> gives me the latency around 7.8 usec. I am not sure why so much of
> difference there in Iperf and Netperf numbers.
I think Andrew already addressed that. To expand on it, those single
byte sends, unless and perhaps even if you set TCP_NODELAY with some
iperf option, were likley bundled-up into larger TCP segments and you
were not running a latency test.
If you were to run:
netperf -t TCP_STREAM -H <remote> -- -m 1
I suspect you would get a result similar to that of iperf's.
rick jones
More information about the netperf-talk
mailing list