[netperf-talk] naming and/or locations
Rick Jones
rick.jones2 at hp.com
Wed Mar 1 10:21:25 PST 2006
Yun, James K wrote:
> I would keep netperf2 as netperf since that is the current default
> version. Changing it to netperf2 may cause confusions or hassles for
> users.
>
> I would thus install netperf4 as netperf4 to delineate it as a different
> version that is available for users that want it. If netperf4 is a true
> superset of netperf2 (i.e., it can be set to function exactly like
> netperf2), then eventually you may want to consider replacing netperf2
> with netperf4 if enough users are comfortable with it.
While I can see netperf4 becoming a superset of netperf2 in terms of
available tests, I'm not sure netperf2 is ever going away since it will
not have any of the dependencies of netperf4 (eg pthreads, libxml2,
perhaps glib and gtk)
rick
More information about the netperf-talk
mailing list